Giving Two Talks on One Day
I have been invited to give a talk at the Scholarly Communication Landscape: Opportunities and challenges symposium which will be held at Manchester Conference Centre, Manchester on 30th November 2010. On the same day I’m speaking at the Online Information 2010 conference. However this isn’t a problem; rather I regard it as an opportunity to try out new approaches to speaking at conferences – and I’m pleased to say the the event organisers have also welcomed the opportunity for such experimentation.
The title of the talk is “Personal or Institutional Use of Social Web Services For Scholarly Communication?” and this is a slight reworking of the paper on “Moving From Personal to Organisational Use of the Social Web” which I’ll be presenting at the Online Information conference.
I have used Panopto to create a screencast of the talk. The video of the slides (but not my talking head) has been uploaded to Vimeo. So that on the day the event organisers in Manchester) will be able to display the recording of my talk while, at approximately the same time, I’ll be giving a live version of the talk in London.
Where’s the experimentation, you may ask? Aren’t videos of talking heads at conferences old hat? That’s true. My interest is in providing event materials in advance in order to explore ways of breaking out of the traditional ways in which the higher education sector has gone about organising and delivering conferences.
The need for such experimentation was highlighted by Martin Weller who recently asked “Am I done with conferencing?“. Martin asked a series of questions about traditional approaches to conferences including:
Why don’t we use the net for the information dissemination function (eg make our presentations live beforehand, as video or slidecasts) and then use the face to face segment for discussion?
OK, I’m game. So here’s access to a video presentation of the slides (in Vimeo), the slides and my talking head provided as a screen capture using Panopto and the slides available on Slideshare. And the slides and the video are also embedded below.
But since I’ll be multitasking on the day of the symposium I won’t be able to “use the face to face segment for discussion“. Instead I suggested to the organisers of the symposium that I write a post here on this blog which can provide a forum for comments and discussions. And publishing the post in advance, rather than on the day of the event, will enable others to provide their views and comments.
I should add that pre-recording a video can be nerve-wracking and I know I prefer giving a talk live. I also suspect that the audience may be more prepared to be critical of a pre-recorded video than if a person was giving a live presentation (and if I was giving a live presentation I would probably update the slides, or the talk, to take into account things that had been said previously). However in order to ensure that there is some physical ‘sense of presence’ at the conference by colleague Stephanie Taylor will be attending the conference and will be able to response to any questions.
But having buy medications no prescription said that, we wouldn’t make changes if we weren’t prepared to move out of our comfort zone. It also should be pointed out that Martin’s post didn’t specially address the need for cost savings for events. If I had attended the symposium it would have involve the costs of the train fare and, probably, a night’s accommodation as well as my time. Instead I spent an hour or so on making the screencast and gained benefits from spotting weaknesses in the presentation which have been fixed for the talk at Online Information. In addition there is a video and audio of the talk which would probably have not been provided otherwise.
I should also add that I hope there will be a Twitter event hashtag for the two events, so it should be possible to engage in discussions that way. And if the two talks do take place simultaneously I’m sure that will confuse people trying to work out what @briankelly is talking about 🙂
What’s the Talk About?
But enough of the process, what about the content of the talk? As mentioned above the title of the talk is “Personal or Institutional Use of Social Web Services For Scholarly Communication?” and this is a slight reworking of the paper on “Moving From Personal to Organisational Use of the Social Web. The abstract of the talk is given below:
Social Web services, such as blogs, have been used successfully by early adopters. But should we now see such services being migrated to the institutional environment in order to address institutional concerns? Or should the institution seek to exploit the benefits of such out-sourced approaches?
In this talk Brian will provide examples of successful blogs provided by various early adopters within the UK higher education community. He will describe how such bloggers have developed approaches which maintain the authority and integrity of the blogger whilst maintaining a professional approach which is appreciative of potential institutional concerns.
Brian suggests that rather than seeking to move such blogs into an institutional context, the cuts in funding in higher and further education may result in greater use of Cloud Services rather than in-house software. If this is the case then the approaches taken by such early adopters may become mainstream and provide the basis for the development of institutional guidelines on use of Social Web services to support institutional activities.
Note that this talk will be given as a pre-recorded video as the speaker is giving a talk on the same day at the Online Information conference. This double-booking provides an opportunity to evaluate the potential of online delivery of talks at conference.
The slides are available on Slideshare and embedded below:
In his post Martin Weller said that he was “done with the traditional conference format” and feels that “we should stop wasting [value time at conferences] giving presentations“. Is an alternative approach to pre-record a talk for conference delegates to watch in advance? But will they, I wonder? And how comfortable will speakers be with recording their talks?